Support triage and resolution
Classify requests, retrieve context, draft a response, route exceptions, and capture feedback.
MeasureFirst response, resolution time, human minutes, reopen rate
Accountable AI delivery for mid-market operators
Peter Olson / Tier9AI
I help mid-market B2B software and technology-enabled service companies move one customer or service operation from baseline to controlled production in six weeks - without hiring a full-time AI executive.
Paid diagnostic · fixed scope · no free multi-hour workshop
Controlled production / WF-01
Customer operations workflow
Scope
1 workflow
Owner
Named
Result
Measured
Enterprise credibility
AWS · American Express · Wells Fargo · Fidelity
Operator perspective
Product, cloud, AI, and hands-on SaaS ownership
Initial market
B2B software and technology-enabled services
Primary buyers
COO · CIO/CTO · Customer · Product · Operations
The ownership gap
The missing work is not another strategy deck or chatbot. It is selecting a worthwhile workflow, proving the economics, choosing the right implementation path, aligning every decision-maker, controlling risk, driving adoption, and reporting the result.
The unit of sale
One workflow. One accountable owner. One controlled launch. One measurable result.
Start with customer and service operations
The first engagement is deliberately narrow. The goal is not enterprise-wide transformation; it is one workflow for one team with a clear owner and measures that already matter to the business.
Classify requests, retrieve context, draft a response, route exceptions, and capture feedback.
MeasureFirst response, resolution time, human minutes, reopen rate
Coordinate intake, dependencies, handoffs, status updates, and exception ownership across teams.
MeasureCycle time, stalled accounts, rework, time to value
Make approved product, policy, and account knowledge retrievable inside the daily workflow.
MeasureSearch time, answer quality, escalations, adoption
Normalize qualitative feedback, identify themes, connect evidence, and support prioritization.
MeasureHandling time, coverage, theme quality, decision latency
Assemble account signals, flag risk, draft narratives, and keep a human accountable for the readout.
MeasurePreparation time, coverage, risk detection, follow-through
Move work between sales, onboarding, support, delivery, and finance with explicit owners and exceptions.
MeasureQueue age, missed handoffs, rework, customer delay
The first purchase
01 / The starting point
A fixed-scope decision package for one high-friction workflow - before anyone buys another tool or starts another pilot.
Timeline
10 business days
Price
$7,500 introductory fee
$12,500 after the first two clients.
Executive decision package
Current-state workflow and exception map
Baseline economics and measurable success criteria
Use-case, data, integration, and risk scorecard
Build, buy, configure, or simplify recommendation
Human controls, evaluation, logging, and accountability plan
Executive ROI model and six-week implementation plan
50% at signing and 50% at the executive readout. $5,000 is credited toward a sprint signed within 30 days.
Fixed scope · defined exclusions
The path after a sound decision
02 / After the diagnostic
$30,000-$45,000
Approximately 6 weeks
One narrowly scoped workflow taken into controlled production for one team, with delivery leadership and measurement included.
03 / After a successful launch
$12,000-$18,000 per month
3-month minimum
Limited-scope leadership for the roadmap, executive steering, vendors, governance, adoption, cost control, and value realization.
For deal teams and investors
AI and Technical Due Diligence · $10,000-$20,000
A private, referral-led assessment of architecture, product, cloud economics, AI claims, security exposure, technical debt, and post-close priorities.
Baseline to controlled production
Peter owns the connective work between the executive buyer, workflow owner, technical team, risk partners, and implementation specialists. Engineering capacity can flex; accountability does not.
01
Baseline
Volume, labor, cycle time, rework, errors, escalations, and customer impact become the starting line.
02
Decide
The answer is vendor-neutral. AI is used only where it improves the economics or operating result.
03
Control
Security, privacy, evaluation, logging, human review, and failure handling are designed before launch.
04
Launch
A controlled release, explicit owner, team enablement, and operating runbook keep the change usable.
05
Measure
Executives see operational and financial movement, not a demo count or a vague AI-adoption metric.
Evidence before claims
Tier9AI does not present synthetic demos, directional estimates, or software usage as a client result. A credible case begins with a baseline and ends with measured production evidence.
01
Volume, human effort, delay, rework, exceptions, and customer impact are documented before the workflow changes.
02
The build-versus-buy choice, architecture, human-control points, and risk decisions are explicit and reviewable.
03
The readout compares production performance with the baseline. No invented savings and no demo metrics presented as ROI.

The accountability model
Peter leads the decision, delivery, controls, adoption, and value readout. Specialists add capacity without fragmenting ownership.
Lead with Peter. Deliver through Tier9AI.
Peter Olson's background spans AWS, American Express, Wells Fargo, Fidelity, and hands-on SaaS ownership. The through-line is translating complicated operating problems into executable technology programs - aligning executives and technical teams, managing dependencies and risk, and getting the work into production.
Experience across AWS, American Express, Wells Fargo, and Fidelity
Enterprise product, cloud, AI, and operating-program leadership
Hands-on SaaS ownership and product economics
Cross-functional delivery spanning executives, product, engineering, risk, and operations
Qualify the fit before the work
Common questions
Because the expensive mistake is building the wrong thing. The diagnostic establishes the baseline, decision, controls, economics, and implementation path for one workflow before a larger commitment.
No. The recommendation may be to buy, configure, simplify, or use conventional automation. The decision is based on operating value, data readiness, risk, integration effort, and measurability.
The workflow has an accountable owner, defined human approvals, exception handling, evaluation, logging, security and privacy boundaries, a fallback path, and measures tied to the original baseline.
An executive sponsor, a workflow owner, access to the relevant people and systems, usable baseline data, and timely decisions from technology, security, legal, data, or operations when they are involved.
Measures are selected before implementation and can include cycle time, human minutes, escalation and reopen rates, error and exception rates, customer satisfaction, throughput, or cost per resolved request.
No. The initial 20-minute fit call only determines whether there is a credible workflow, owner, baseline, implementation capacity, and budget. The analysis itself is the paid AI Workflow Value Diagnostic.
Workflow fit review
Share five essential facts first. Then schedule a 20-minute qualification call. Baseline, ownership, budget, and control questions are discussed on that call. It is not a free assessment.
Prefer email? peter@tier9ai.com
Start with one workflow
Give Peter the five facts needed for an informed first conversation. Deeper baseline, ownership, budget, and control questions belong in the qualification call—not in your first form.
The working constraint
One market. One workflow family. One accountable result.